ARCHIVED - Audit of the Quality Management Program and the Application of the Intervention Policy - Follow-up Report Status Update as of March 31, 2011
This Web page has been archived on the Web. Archived information is provided for reference, research or record keeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
PDF Version (38 Kb, 6 Pages)
Action Plan Implementation Status Update Report to the Audit Committee - As of March 31, 2011
Regional Operations, Chief Financial Officer
Audit of the Quality Management Program and the Application of the Intervention Policy (200725)
AEC Approval Date: 26/02/2009
|Project Recommendations||Action Plan||Expected Completion Date||Program Response|
1. The IP be reassessed with a view to clarifying policy objectives, revising policy components needed to ensure consistency with the objectives, and providing related tools and guidance to ensure the policy is implemented as intended.
Policy revisions and related guidance to provide, at a minimum, clarity regarding:
A sustainable strategy and approach be established to performing regional quality assurance reviews to monitor and validate compliance with the IP.
|The CFO, in collaboration with Senior ADM, Regional Operations and Program ADM's, will undertake a review of the Intervention Policy. This review will involve confirmation of policy objectives and the identification of those policy changes required to address the implementation and clarity issues noted in the Horizontal Audit. The outcome of the review will include a workplan and timetable for recommended changes to the Intervention Policy and/or related guidance.||31 December, 2009||
A review was carried out in summer 2009 and a full evaluation during the fall of 2009. Subsequently the Intervention Policy was significantly redrafted as the Default Prevention and Management Policy. First Nations were engaged on this draft Policy in summer 2010. Approval of the Policy is anticipated in the first quarter of 2011-2012.
AES: The recommendation will be closed once the policy has been approved and announced formally.
|2. In the short term, tools and practices (e.g. formal criteria, guidance and training) be developed, based on risk and current best practices, that will support consistent application of judgment to a particular recipient situation and that will clarify the conditions of default as described in the IP.||The CFO, in collaboration with Senior ADM, Regional Operations and Program ADM's, will identify, recommend and develop the tools and practices required to support a more consistent application of the Intervention Policy across regions. Recommendations regarding required tools and practices will be based on risk and current best practices.||30 June, 2009||
As of 31/03/2011:
The CFO, in collaboration with Senior ADM Regional Operations and Programs established interim tools. Approval of the new Policy on Default Prevention and Management is expected in imminent. A supporting directive and final guidance and tools relating to the Management Action Plan is expected to be finalized by the end of the first quarter of 2011-2012.
AES: The recommendation will be closed once the policy has been approved and announced formally and final guidance / supporting tools have been finalized and communicated.
3. An integrated and standardized Quality Management Program* be developed and operationalized. The QMP to provide, as a minimum, clarity regarding:
* Quality Management Program components to be tailored to the unique circumstances of Northern Regions.
|The Senior ADM, Regional Operations, in collaboration with the CFO and Program ADM's, will develop and operationalize a Department-wide Quality Management Program for Grants and Contributions. The QMP will be designed to address the specific issues regarding roles and responsibilities of key stakeholders and the promotion of a risk-based approach to compliance reviews. Guidance will be developed regarding acceptable staffing/ organizational models for compliance reviews with a view to promoting consistency and appropriate segregation of duties. The QMP will be developed by December 31, 2009 and implemented by June 30, 2010.||30 June, 2010||
An umbrella Quality Management Framework was drafted in Summer 2010. This document is being further refined based on comments at the Departmental Operations Committee. When finalized, this Framework will articulate the Department's vision for quality management. In addition, the Policy on Transfer Payments. Management Control Framework will provide quality management guidance for all grants and contributions programs that is consistent with the Policy on Transfer Payments. PTP guidance documents are expected to be ready for approval early in 2011-2012. Individual program branches responsible for grants and contributions will be responsible for building quality management principles into their guidance documents. All other branches will be responsible for quality management in their areas consistent with the overall framework and with policies and directives relating to their operations (e.g., IMIT).
AES: Implementation on-going. The recommendation will be closed once the Quality Management Framework has been implemented and PTP guidance has be finalized and communicated to internal stakeholders.
|4. Standard expectations, guidance and tools be established for the implementation of quality control activities at the regional level, including guidance regarding the monitoring, review and documentation of recipient program reports.||The Senior ADM, Regional Operations, in collaboration with the CFO and Program ADM's, will develop a common set of expectations, guidance and tools for the implementation of quality control activities at the regional level.||June 30, 2009||
RO Regions have developed compliance plans. These are being updated for 2011-2012. In addition RO Regions and Social Program are working together to develop a comprehensive approach to risk based compliance and program management. RO regions will examine options for enhancing Education and Community Facilities Maintenance Program compliance approaches in 2011-2012.
AES: Implementation on-going. The recommendation will be closed upon completion of the comprehensive approach to risk-based compliance and program management.
|5. Standard requirements be defined for the review of recipient's audited financial statements at a regional level, clarifying expectations related to the formality of the Audit Review Committee (ARC) and representation on the ARC.||The CFO, in collaboration with Senior ADM, Regional Operations and the CAE will develop a model for the review of recipient's audited financial statements as well as the expectations for the composition and the role ARCs.||June 30, 2009||
Baseline data from all regions has been gathered and the identification of a minimum standard is being developed.
AES: Implementation on-going. The recommendation will be closed once the standards have been finalized, the model for recipient review completed and the expectation for the roles and composition of ARCs defined and implemented.
|6. An audit clause be incorporated in the new CFNFAs outlining the right to conduct timely compliance reviews and program directives include CFNFAs within the requirements for audit, including stipulated frequency of these audits.||This recommendation has been addressed.||N/A||
AES: Fully implemented. The recommendation has been closed.
- Date modified: