Symbol of the Government of Canada

Institutional links

Frequently Asked Questions


We have included some of the most commonly asked questions at public information sessions and community visits. Please don't hesitate to contact us should you not find an answer to your question in this section of the website.

GENERAL QUESTIONS

REMEDIATION

HEALTH AND SAFETY

FROZEN BLOCK

ENVIRONMENT

GENERAL QUESTIONS

Arsenic Trioxide

What is arsenic? Is it harmful?

What is arsenic trioxide and does it have a half-life?

How much arsenic trioxide is there at Giant Mine?

How and where is the arsenic trioxide currently stored?

Is there arsenic trioxide in the tailings ponds?

Have there been studies on the extent of arsenic trioxide contamination on the surface at Giant Mine and in the nearby area?

Other

How has public input influenced recent decisions made about Giant Mine?

Why is it important to move forward with any long-term alternative now?

Is the Frozen Block method a "walk-away" solution for Giant Mine?

How does the contamination at Giant Mine compare to other contaminated sites around the world?

Is the federal government committed to further research and development now that a Remediation Plan has been finalized?

What if new technology in the future reveals a better method for dealing with the arsenic trioxide dust? Can the work be reversed?

Who is paying for the clean-up of Giant Mine?

How can the public get more information on the Giant Mine project and offer their feedback?

 

REMEDIATION

What is a Remediation Plan?

Why do we need a Remediation Plan? What is the point?

What does the Remediation Plan cover?

Is there anything the Remediation Plan doesn't cover?

Why can't INAC just go ahead with the remediation?

Who is the Remediation Plan being submitted to?

When will remediation of the site be finished?

Will the remediation work remove all traces of arsenic trioxide from the area?

Is the Remediation Plan a "safe" plan?

Where can I get a copy of the Remediation Plan? What does it look like?

How was the Remediation Plan developed? How do you know you've got it right?

What will the mine site look like when the Remediation Plan is finished?

 

HEALTH AND SAFETY

Is the water in Yellowknife safe to drink?

Is treated water getting into the water supply?

Exactly how safe is the mine site right now?

Do you have a contingency plan in place in case of an emergency at the site?

Are the underground storage chambers really safe?

 

FROZEN BLOCK

Why is INAC going forward with the Frozen Block method?

How does the Frozen Block method work?

How long will the frozen blocks remain frozen? What if there is a power disruption?

What are thermosyphons and how do they work?

Water expands when it freezes. Could the freezing cause fractures or otherwise affect the stability of the chambers?

Has Global Warming been factored into the freezing option?

Will the permafrost in the area of Giant Mine re-establish itself?

 

ENVIRONMENT

Why not just take the arsenic out and send it back where it belongs?

Why is INAC not taking the arsenic trioxide out of the mine and shipping it away?

Why was Baker Creek relocated and what will it look like after the remediation work is finished?

Can we fish in Baker Creek? Can we drink the water from Baker Creek?

Will there be any trees or vegetation after the remediation work is finished?


GENERAL


Arsenic Trioxide

Q. What is arsenic? Is it harmful?
A. Arsenic — like oxygen, copper, zinc or iron — is an element of the periodic table. It occurs naturally in the rock throughout the earth, and is toxic. However the bedrock in the Yellowknife area contains arsenopyrite, a naturally occurring mineral composed of iron, sulphur and arsenic. The arsenic that is found in the arsenopyrite is in a stable form and does not present a health hazard.

Q. What is arsenic trioxide and does it have a half-life?
A. Arsenic — like oxygen, copper, zinc or iron — is a naturally occurring element. When the ore taken from the Yellowknife area was roasted to remove the gold, the arsenic was changed into an arsenic-rich gas which combined with oxygen to form arsenic trioxide dust. Arsenic does not have a half-life, meaning it does not decay over time.

Q. How much arsenic trioxide is there at Giant Mine?
A. About 237,000 tonnes of arsenic trioxide dust is stored in 15 underground chambers on the mine site. The dust stored underground is about 79% arsenic trioxide and contains other minerals such as iron, antimony and gold. The roaster at Giant Mine is no longer in use and no new arsenic trioxide has been produced since Royal Oak Mines went bankrupt in 1999.

Q. How and where is the arsenic trioxide currently stored?
A. The arsenic trioxide dust is stored in 15 mined-out chambers located in solid rock between 80 and 250 feet below the surface. The chambers are all located near the "C" shaft on the mine site. The arsenic trioxide is not in barrels, and the chambers are not under the lake or under the communities of N'Dilo, Dettah or Yellowknife.

Q. Is there arsenic trioxide in the tailings ponds?
A. There is very little arsenic trioxide in the tailings. Most of the arsenic in the tailings is in stable forms, including arsenopyrite, which is a natural arsenic-bearing mineral found in the bedrock of Yellowknife.

Q. Have there been studies on the extent of arsenic trioxide contamination on the surface at Giant Mine and in the nearby area?
A. Yes, there are several completed studies on arsenic contamination on surface. Studies are available at the Giant Mine Remediation Project's Public Registry, located on the First Floor, Waldron Building, 5103 - 48 Street.

Back to top of page

Other

Q. How has public input influenced recent decisions made about Giant Mine?
A. INAC's Giant Mine Remediation Project team has worked diligently to engage the communities of Yellowknife, N'Dilo and Dettah and listen to their concerns. When the public told the team it wanted more information, INAC extended its communications efforts by four months and participated in 20 additional public sessions. The majority of residents said they did not want a "take it out" alternative due to high worker health and safety risks, among other reasons. The public is now telling INAC that it is time to move forward with remediating the site, and INAC has submitted its Remediation Plan for Giant Mine to the regulatory process.

Q. Why is it important to move forward with any long-term alternative now?
A. A long-term management strategy is needed now to minimize the risk posed by the arsenic trioxide at Giant Mine. Although the 237,000 tonnes of arsenic trioxide dust is currently being safely contained and managed, such a large amount of toxic material demands a more comprehensive plan to minimize the risk. INAC has dedicated more than three years of research and community consultation to finding the most effective alternative to protect the health and safety of northerners and the environment. The answers are in and it is time to move forward with a solid long-term plan.

Q. Is the Frozen Block method a "walk-away" solution for Giant Mine?
A. A total “walk-away” solution does not exist. The arsenic trioxide dust that is in the stopes and chambers would be contained in frozen blocks, but a smaller amount remains distributed throughout the other underground mine workings. Ongoing water treatment is likely to be required to ensure this arsenic does not leave the site. All of the arsenic trioxide management alternatives would require ongoing water treatment and monitoring, including those options that would take the arsenic trioxide out of the stopes and chambers.

Q. How does the contamination at Giant Mine compare to other contaminated sites around the world?
A. It is believed that Giant Mine holds the largest amount of stored arsenic trioxide dust in the world. The fact that it is located near a city and on the shores of a large lake are also significant risk factors.

Q. Is the federal government committed to further research and development now that a Remediation Plan has been finalized?
A. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) will continue to protect human health and safety, and the environment, even once the remediation is complete. The Giant Mine site will be continuously monitored and inspected. New and relevant information regarding this project will also continue to be considered and evaluated.

Q. What if new technology in the future reveals a better method for dealing with the arsenic trioxide dust instead of freezing it? Can the work be reversed?
A. Freezing can always be reversed in the unlikely event that better cost-effective technologies for dealing with the arsenic trioxide are developed.

Q. Who is paying for the clean-up of Giant Mine?
A. The Government of Canada and the GNWT will share the costs of remediation at Giant Mine according to terms laid out in the 2005 Cooperation Agreement.

Q. How can the public get more information on the Giant Mine project and offer their feedback?
A. There are several ways to learn more about the Giant Mine Remediation Project. Information about the project can be found on this website and at the Giant Mine Remediation Project's public registry on the 1st floor of the Waldrun Building in Yellowknife. For more information, please call the project office at (867) 669-2426.

The Giant Mine Community Alliance is a public advisory group set up to relay public concerns to INAC. For more information, contact one of the GMCA Co-Chairs: Lynda Comerford (867) 873- 4746 or Steve Petersen (867) 873-5192 or email: GMCA-ACMG@inac-ainc.gc.ca.

Back to top of page

REMEDIATION


Q. What is a Remediation Plan?
A. The Remediation Plan for Giant Mine is the blueprint for cleaning-up the Giant Mine site to ensure that human health and safety and the environment are protected for the future.

Q. Why do we need a Remediation Plan? What is the point?
A. The current status of Giant Mine is unacceptable. The site has been impacted by over 50 years of gold mining and ore processing. Arsenic trioxide stored underground must be effectively managed to protect human health and safety and the environment. The Remediation Plan explains how this will be done and also describes general site clean-up activities on the surface of the mine site.

Q. What does the Remediation Plan cover?
A. The Remediation Plan covers the clean-up of the entire mine site, including the management of the 237,000 tonnes of arsenic trioxide dust currently stored underground, remediation of tailings ponds, and the demolition of buildings and other surface structures.

Q. Is there anything the Remediation Plan doesn't cover?
A. The Remediation Plan was thoroughly reviewed by technical advisors and subject matter experts to ensure it addressed all the issues associated with cleaning up the mine site. It covers all surface and underground aspects of Giant Mine. It does not address future uses of the site after the remediation is completed.

Q. Why can't INAC just go ahead with the remediation?
A. We need to apply for a water license as part of the regulatory process first, and get approval for our plan before we can begin doing the work.

Q. Who is the Remediation Plan being submitted to?
A. The Remediation Plan was submitted to the Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board    as part of an application for a water license in accordance with the regulatory process.

Q. When will remediation of the site be finished?
A. We expect that the surface remediation may take up to 10 years to complete, while the complete freezing of the underground arsenic trioxide chambers and surrounding areas may take up to 15 years to complete.

Q. Will the remediation work remove all traces of arsenic trioxide from the area?
A. Most of the arsenic trioxide will stay safely sealed in the underground chambers behind concrete bulkheads and will be frozen. Any soils on the surface that are contaminated will be excavated and disposed of safely at the mine site.

Q. Is the Remediation Plan a "safe" plan?
A. Yes. The Remediation Plan includes clean-up methods that have been successfully used at other contaminated sites across North America. Safety measures that were developed for other clean-up projects in North America have been adopted for the remediation of Giant Mine. Managing the arsenic trioxide dust where it is currently stored will avoid the potential worker health and safety risks associated with having to move or handle the toxic material in the "take out" option.

Q. Where can I get a copy of the Remediation Plan? What does it look like?
A. The Remediation Plan is more than 200 pages long, and there are more than 40 supporting technical documents — maps, diagrams, tables, spreadsheets, illustrations — making for a pile of binders more than two feet high. Click here for an Executive Summary of the Remediation Plan. All supporting technical documents — including the complete Remediation Plan and supporting documents — are available through our public registry located on the First Floor, Waldron Building, 5103 - 48 Street.

Q. How was the Remediation Plan developed? How do you know you've got it right?
A. INAC and its Technical Advisor spent the last five years assessing the conditions at Giant Mine to gather the necessary information for developing the Remediation Plan. The initial plan for the long-term management of the underground arsenic trioxide dust was presented to the public and discussed at two separate workshops in 2003. Subsequently, the management plan for the underground arsenic trioxide dust was incorporated with the plans for the surface clean-up, to form the Giant Mine Remediation Plan.

The Remediation Plan addresses all aspects of the underground and surface clean-up of the mine and incorporates industry-best practices and technologies. It was subject to extensive review by an Independent Peer Review Panel, as well as by experts in other government departments. The long-term remediation of Giant Mine will be carried out in a manner that complies with all applicable legislation.

Q. What will the mine site look like when the Remediation Plan is finished?
A. The goal of the remediation is to minimize public health and safety issues and environmental concerns. Best efforts will be made to return the site to the natural landscape for the Yellowknife area. However, there will be some small areas that will need to remain under active management and monitoring — notably the water treatment plant, and the ground freezing system.

Back to top of page

HEALTH & SAFETY


Q. Is the water in Yellowknife safe to drink?
A. Yellowknife's water is safe to drink. It comes from the Yellowknife River and is collected well upstream of the Giant Mine before the river enters Yellowknife Bay. Arsenic is a naturally occurring element that is commonly found in the water of many rivers and lakes including the Yellowknife River. These trace amounts of arsenic are well below the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality, similar to levels found in many other communities such as Gameti, Edmonton and Toronto.

Q. Is treated water getting into the water supply?
A. Giant's treated mine water does not get into Yellowknife's water supply. The treated mine water is released into Baker Creek. Yellowknife's drinking water is collected from the Yellowknife River, well upstream of Giant Mine, before the river enters Yellowknife Bay. The quality of this water is monitored by the City of Yellowknife.

Q. Exactly how safe is the mine site right now?
A. Safety is our first priority at Giant Mine. The NWT Mine Safety Inspector regularly inspects the site to observe the working conditions above and underground for qualified mine workers. These workers are well-trained in mine safety measures and have years of experience working in the mining industry. Every precaution is taken during their shifts and they have a good understanding of the risks they face. Security personnel are responsible for ensuring the public does not go on the site.

Q. Do you have a contingency plan in place in case of an emergency at the site?
A. Yes. Deton'Cho Nuna Joint Venture has a comprehensive Emergency Response Plan that covers many different situations. For example it was effectively put into motion when a minor fire was discovered in a ventilation unit on April 10, 2007.

Q. Are the underground storage chambers really safe?
A. The current storage of arsenic trioxide underground at Giant Mine is safe. The underground storage chambers are contained in bedrock and sealed with concrete bulkheads. The pumps at Giant Mine keep the level of groundwater well below the storage chambers. Any water seepage that comes into contact with the storage chambers is collected in the mine water system, pumped to the surface and treated. The mine and local surface waters are regularly monitored to ensure that arsenic trioxide does not escape into the environment. The arsenic trioxide at Giant Mine has been stored safely underground for decades and will continue to be safely stored until the Remediation Plan — and Frozen Block Method — is fully implemented.

Back to top of page

FROZEN BLOCK


Q. Why is INAC going forward with the Frozen Block method?
A. Freezing the arsenic trioxide in place is the best long-term management strategy to protect Northerners and the environment. Of all the alternatives considered, it offers the least risks, including low risks to worker health and safety, low risk of arsenic release during the implementation of the management method, and low risk of arsenic release over the long term. Freezing the arsenic trioxide dust and the surrounding rock will effectively isolate the dust from the environment. There will be no seepage of water into or out of the frozen zones, and there will be no release of arsenic. This decision comes after three years of extensive scientific and technical research, and community consultation. Fifty-six management alternatives were considered; 12 were studied in detail, and finally, the Frozen Block method was selected for remediating the arsenic trioxide dust, based on scientific evidence and community input.

Q. How does the Frozen Block method work?
A. The 15 underground chambers and stopes (mined-out cavities), containing arsenic trioxide dust, will be frozen as solid, impenetrable blocks of ice. The blocks will be frozen using a cooled liquid circulated through a series of underground pipes, which will be attached to a freezing facility on the surface. The system will be very similar to the system used for indoor ice rinks. Thermosyphons will be installed to aid the freezing process and effectively maintain the frozen area indefinitely. The freezing will occur in stages over many years to make certain that the blocks are completely frozen. INAC will ensure that the site is safely managed throughout the entire process. More on the Frozen Block Method.

Q. How long will the frozen blocks remain frozen? What if there is a power disruption?
A. The frozen blocks should remain frozen indefinitely, because thermosyphons will be used to maintain the freezing — if there were no thermosyphons, the solid ice block would stay frozen for more than 50 years. Thermosyphons do not require electricity. Instead, they use the cold air in winter to cool the ground. As a precaution, thermometers would be used to monitor the ground and air temperatures. If thawing were to occur, the active freezing system would be used to refreeze the ground.

Q. What are thermosyphons and how do they work?
A. Thermosyphons are tall, metal tubes that draw and expel heat from the ground. They are commonly used in the North to keep ground frozen. For example, thermosyphons are being used to preserve natural permafrost below the parking lot at the NWT Legislative Assembly in Yellowknife. Thermosyphons are self-sustaining and do not rely on an external source of power.

Q. Water expands when it freezes. Could the freezing cause fractures or otherwise affect the stability of the chambers?
A. Experience elsewhere shows that cracking of the rock is very unlikely. However, the detailed design of the freezing system will need to ensure that the freezing does not create high pressures within the dust or the surrounding rock. This is one of the design details that will be addressed prior to implementation.

Q. Has Global Warming been factored into the freezing option?
A. Yes. The calculations completed by the technical advisor show that the system being considered for freezing the mine will continue to work even with an increase of several degrees in the regional mean temperature. The site will also be continuously monitored using sophisticated equipment. Adjustments will be made if necessary to maintain the frozen areas.

Q. Will the permafrost in the area of Giant Mine re-establish itself?
A. No, the permafrost will not re-establish itself naturally. When the decision was made to store the arsenic trioxide in the chambers underground, it was considered to be the safest place because the chambers and stopes were within the permafrost zone. Over time, mining has caused deterioration of the permafrost. The selected long-term management alternative involves actively freezing the chambers, stopes and surrounding rock into frozen blocks with the use of a large freezing plant, similar to what is used to make artificial ice in rinks.

Back to top of page

ENVIRONMENT


Q. Why not just take the arsenic out and send it back where it belongs?
A. Arsenic doesn't belong anywhere else. It's from here. The arsenic — just like the gold — originates from the local rock. After the ore was mined at Giant Mine, it was roasted to remove the gold. The arsenic, found in the mineral arsenopyrite, was transformed into an arsenic-rich gas which combined with oxygen to form arsenic trioxide dust.

Q. Why is INAC not taking the arsenic trioxide out of the mine and shipping it away?
A. This alternative was thoroughly examined by INAC and its Technical Advisor. It was rejected for many reasons: First, removing the dust would pose significant risks for workers, who would be mining out this highly toxic material. Second, transporting the material would seriously endanger the environment. Members of the public have told INAC that they do not want this level of risk. INAC and its Technical Advisor also looked at options for removing the arsenic trioxide dust and placing it in a secure landfill on the Giant Mine property. That would eliminate the problem of spills during transport, but it would mean that a permanent hazardous waste site would need to be created on the Giant Mine surface. Due to the irregular nature of the rock surrounding the storage chambers, it would be impossible to remove all of the dust. Up to several thousand tonnes of arsenic trioxide dust would likely remain underground. That would mean there would be two hazardous waste sites — one above ground, which would be a surface landfill, and one underground. In the final analysis, all of the "take-it-out" alternatives were found to pose more risks to human health and safety, and the environment, than the Frozen Block alternative.

Q. Why was Baker Creek relocated? What will it look like after the remediation is done?
A. Baker Creek was relocated many times over the course of Giant Mine's history. The latest relocation was done to prevent infiltration of creek water into the mine. Our approach for Baker Creek is one of environmental restoration. We would like to return the creek as close as possible to pre-mining conditions.

Q. Can we fish in Baker Creek? Can we drink the water from Baker Creek?
A. Baker Creek is catch and release fishing only. Eating fish from Baker Creek will likely be discouraged for many years even after the remediation is complete. It may be possible to drink water from Baker Creek many years in the future.

Q. Will there be any trees at the mine site after the remediation is finished?
A. Yes. There are plans to revegetate the approximately 95-hectares of tailings, roads and other areas with native grasses and vegetation. Trees and other plants are expected to move back into the area with time.